FuelEU Compliance

FuelEU Maritime Regulation Compliance – Methodology Guide

This document explains how the SIYA FuelEU Maritime Dashboard monitors, calculates, and manages vessel compliance with EU greenhouse gas intensity regulations using real-time operational data and advanced emission analytics.

FuelEU Compliance Overview

The SIYA FuelEU Maritime Compliance Platform provides comprehensive monitoring and management of vessel compliance with the European Union’s FuelEU Maritime Regulation, which mandates progressive reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity for ships calling at EU ports. The platform transforms complex regulatory requirements into actionable insights, enabling fleet managers and technical superintendents to proactively manage compliance, optimize fuel strategies, and avoid substantial financial penalties. Regulatory Context: The FuelEU Maritime Regulation (EU 2023/1805) entered into force on January 1, 2025, establishing mandatory GHG intensity limits for vessels above 5,000 gross tonnage engaged in maritime transport to, from, or within EU ports. The regulation requires:

Progressive GHG Intensity Reductions: Annual percentage reductions from a 2020 baseline
- 2025: 2% reduction target
- 2030: 6% reduction target
- 2035: 14.5% reduction target
- 2040: 31% reduction target
- 2045: 62% reduction target
- 2050: 80% reduction target
Well-to-Wake Emissions Accounting: Includes both Tank-to-Wake (TTW) and Well-to-Tank (WTT) emissions
Voyage-Based Compliance: Calculated per voyage with annual aggregation
Substantial Penalties: Non-compliance penalties up to €2,400 per tonne of CO₂ equivalent deficit
Flexibility Mechanisms: Pooling, banking, and borrowing of compliance credits

Core Objectives:

Real-Time Compliance Monitoring: Track GHG intensity against regulatory targets continuously
Proactive Risk Management: Identify non-compliance risks early and implement corrective actions
Fuel Strategy Optimization: Analyze fuel mix scenarios to achieve optimal compliance and cost balance
Financial Impact Assessment: Calculate potential penalties and quantify compliance costs
Regulatory Reporting: Generate comprehensive compliance reports for EU authorities
Fleet-Wide Optimization: Coordinate compliance strategies across multiple vessels

The platform processes noon report data, fuel consumption records, and voyage information to calculate precise GHG intensity metrics, assess compliance status, and recommend optimization strategies for achieving regulatory targets.

Data Sources

The FuelEU Compliance platform integrates operational and reference data from multiple sources to perform accurate GHG intensity calculations and compliance assessments:

1) Noon Reports from Vessels (Primary Operational Data)

Noon reports submitted daily by vessels provide the foundational operational data for GHG calculations:

Fuel Consumption Data: Quantities consumed by fuel type (HFO, MDO, MGO, LNG, Biofuels, etc.)
Distance Traveled: Nautical miles sailed in 24-hour reporting period
Voyage Information: Current voyage leg, route, cargo operations
Port Calls: Arrival and departure times at EU and non-EU ports
Shore Power Usage: Duration of shore power connection at berth
Operational Mode: At sea, in port, maneuvering, cargo operations
Engine Performance: Main engine and auxiliary engine running hours and loads
Weather Conditions: Sea state, wind speed, currents affecting fuel efficiency

Data Refresh Frequency: Daily noon reports with real-time integration upon receipt

2) ERP Software System (Vessel & Fleet Management)

The enterprise ERP system provides vessel particulars and fleet management data:

Vessel Specifications: IMO numbers, vessel names, gross tonnage, deadweight
Technical Parameters: Engine types, installed power, propulsion systems
Trading Patterns: Historical routes, typical port calls, operational profiles
Fleet Structure: Vessel ownership, management, and operational responsibility
Bunker Records: Fuel procurement, delivery notes, fuel quality certificates
Cargo Data: Cargo types, quantities, and transport work performed

Data Refresh Frequency: Daily synchronization with critical updates in real-time

3) External Voyage APIs (Position & ETA Data)

Third-party maritime data providers supply real-time vessel tracking and voyage information:

Current Position: Real-time latitude, longitude, and vessel status
Port Identification: Automatic detection of EU vs. non-EU port calls
ETA Calculations: Predicted arrival times at next ports
Voyage Routing: Planned and actual routes with distance calculations
Port Metadata: EU port classification, shore power availability, compliance requirements
AIS Data Integration: Automated voyage leg identification and EU water detection

Data Refresh Frequency: Hourly position updates with continuous AIS monitoring

4) Regulatory Reference Data (Emission Factors & Compliance Rules)

The platform maintains comprehensive regulatory reference databases:

Official Emission Factors: EU-mandated emission factors for all fuel types
- Lower Calorific Value (LCV) in MJ/g of fuel
- CO₂ equivalent Well-to-Tank (WtT) emissions in gCO₂eq/MJ
- Carbon content factors (Cf) for CO₂, CH₄, N₂O
- Carbon slip factors (Cslip) for specific engine types
- Engine-specific factors (ICE, LNG Otto, Fuel Cells)
Compliance Targets: Annual GHG intensity reduction targets by year
Penalty Rates: Current penalty amounts per tonne CO₂ equivalent
Fuel Classifications: Fossil fuels, biofuels, renewable fuels of non-biological origin (RFNBO)
Shore Power Requirements: Minimum connection time thresholds at EU ports
EU Port Registry: Complete list of ports subject to FuelEU Maritime regulation

Data Refresh Frequency: Updated annually or upon regulatory amendments

5) Derived Analytics (Platform Calculations)

The platform generates additional intelligence through advanced processing:

GHG Intensity Calculations: Well-to-wake emissions per unit of energy (g CO₂e/MJ)
Compliance Balance: Surplus or deficit against annual targets (g CO₂e)
Penalty Forecasts: Projected financial penalties based on current performance
Fuel Mix Optimization: Recommended fuel blending strategies for compliance
Voyage-Level Compliance: Individual voyage assessment and aggregation
Trend Analysis: Historical performance and future compliance projections
What-If Scenarios: Impact modeling for different fuel strategies

Data Flow and Processing

Integration Architecture

The FuelEU Compliance platform follows a sophisticated multi-layer architecture ensuring accurate, real-time GHG intensity calculations and compliance monitoring across the fleet.

ETL Processing Pipeline

The comprehensive ETL pipeline transforms raw operational data through multiple stages of validation, calculation, and compliance assessment:

Data Processing Stages

Stage 1: Extraction

Noon Report Parsing: Extract fuel consumption, distance, and operational data from daily reports
Bunker Records: Pull fuel procurement data including fuel type, quantity, and quality certificates
Voyage Information: Retrieve route, port calls, and cargo data from ship logs
Position Tracking: Obtain real-time vessel positions and voyage legs from AIS/API sources
Emission Factors: Load current regulatory emission factors for all fuel types
Frequency: Continuous streaming for noon reports; daily batch for supporting data

Stage 2: Transformation

2.1 Data Validation & Cleansing

Verify fuel consumption quantities against bunker inventory
Validate distance calculations against AIS track data
Check for missing or anomalous data points
Correct fuel type nomenclature inconsistencies
Flag data quality issues for manual review

2.2 EU Leg Classification

Identify port calls at EU member state ports
Calculate distance sailed within EU waters
Determine voyage legs subject to FuelEU regulation:
- 100% counted: Voyages between two EU ports
- 50% counted: Voyages from EU port to non-EU port (or vice versa)
- 0% counted: Voyages between two non-EU ports
Apply shore power connection time requirements

2.3 Energy Content Calculation For each fuel type consumed, calculate total energy delivered:

E_{fuel} = m_{fuel} \ imes LCV_{fuel}

Where:

$E_{fuel}$ = Energy content in megajoules (MJ)
$m_{fuel}$ = Mass of fuel consumed in grams (g)
$LCV_{fuel}$ = Lower Calorific Value in MJ/g (from regulatory tables)

2.4 Tank-to-Wake (TTW) Emission Calculation Calculate direct combustion emissions:

E_{TTW} = \sum_{i} \left( m_{fuel,i} \ imes \left[ Cf_{CO_2,i} \ imes \frac{44}{12} + Cf_{CH_4,i} \ imes GWP_{CH_4} + Cf_{N_2O,i} \ imes GWP_{N_2O} \ ight] \ ight)

Where:

$E_{TTW}$ = Tank-to-wake emissions in g CO₂ equivalent
$m_{fuel,i}$ = Mass of fuel type $i$ consumed in grams
$Cf_{CO_2,i}$ = Carbon content for CO₂ (g C per g fuel)
$Cf_{CH_4,i}$ = Carbon content for CH₄ (g C per g fuel)
$Cf_{N_2O,i}$ = Carbon content for N₂O (g N₂O per g fuel)
$\frac{44}{12}$ = Molecular weight conversion factor (CO₂/C)
$GWP_{CH_4}$ = Global Warming Potential of methane (28 for 100-year horizon)
$GWP_{N_2O}$ = Global Warming Potential of nitrous oxide (265 for 100-year horizon)

2.5 Well-to-Tank (WTT) Emission Calculation Calculate upstream production and distribution emissions:

E_{WTT} = \sum_{i} \left( E_{fuel,i} \ imes EF_{WTT,i} \ ight)

Where:

$E_{WTT}$ = Well-to-tank emissions in g CO₂ equivalent
$E_{fuel,i}$ = Energy content of fuel type $i$ in MJ
$EF_{WTT,i}$ = Well-to-tank emission factor in g CO₂eq/MJ (from regulatory tables)

2.6 GHG Intensity Calculation Calculate the well-to-wake GHG intensity:

GHG_{intensity} = \frac{E_{TTW} + E_{WTT}}{E_{total}}

Where:

$GHG_{intensity}$ = GHG intensity in g CO₂e/MJ
$E_{TTW}$ = Total tank-to-wake emissions in g CO₂e
$E_{WTT}$ = Total well-to-tank emissions in g CO₂e
$E_{total}$ = Total energy consumed in MJ

2.7 Compliance Balance Calculation Calculate surplus or deficit against regulatory target:

Balance = \left( GHG_{target} - GHG_{actual} \ ight) \ imes E_{total}

Where:

$Balance$ = Compliance balance in g CO₂e (positive = surplus, negative = deficit)
$GHG_{target}$ = Regulatory target GHG intensity for the year in g CO₂e/MJ
$GHG_{actual}$ = Actual GHG intensity achieved in g CO₂e/MJ
$E_{total}$ = Total energy consumed on EU legs in MJ

Stage 3: Loading

Voyage Records: Store individual voyage compliance data with detailed breakdowns
Annual Aggregation: Compile year-to-date compliance balance and trend analysis
Penalty Calculations: Compute potential financial penalties for non-compliance scenarios
Real-Time Dashboards: Update live compliance status displays
Alert Generation: Trigger notifications for non-compliance risks or target exceedances
Regulatory Reports: Prepare formatted reports for EU authority submission

Key Capabilities

📊 Real-Time Compliance Monitoring

Continuous tracking of GHG intensity against EU regulatory targets with instant alerts for non-compliance risks. Visual dashboards show actual vs. target performance with compliance balance calculations.

⛽ Comprehensive Fuel Analysis

Detailed breakdown of fuel consumption by type with GHG emission factors. Track usage of conventional fuels, biofuels, LNG, methanol, and alternative fuels with percentage contribution to total energy.

🚢 Voyage-Level Tracking

Individual voyage compliance assessment with EU vs. non-EU leg classification. Automatic calculation of GHG intensity per voyage with verification status and compliance surplus/deficit.

💰 Penalty Calculation

Automated financial impact assessment showing potential penalties for non-compliance. Real-time calculation of penalty amounts based on compliance deficit and current EU penalty rates.

🔌 Shore Power Integration

Track shore power connection compliance at EU ports. Monitor connection duration, percentage of time connected, and compliance with minimum shore power usage requirements.

📈 Regulatory Reporting

Generate comprehensive compliance reports for EU authorities. Export detailed fuel consumption, GHG analysis, and compliance documentation in required regulatory formats.

Core Modules

1. Overview Dashboard

Strategic Compliance Visibility: The Overview Dashboard provides immediate visibility into vessel compliance status with key performance indicators prominently displayed for rapid assessment. Key Metrics Displayed: Actual GHG Intensity

Current GHG intensity in g CO₂e/MJ
Large numeric display with color coding:
- 🔴 Red: Exceeds target (non-compliant)
- 🟢 Green: Meets or below target (compliant)
Real-time calculation based on year-to-date fuel consumption and energy

Example Display:

Actual GHG Intensity
91.57
g CO₂e/MJ

(Displayed in red indicating non-compliance) 2025 Regulatory Target

EU-mandated GHG intensity target for current year
Shows percentage reduction from baseline
Blue color coding to distinguish from actual performance

Example Display:

2025 Target
89.34
g CO₂e/MJ (2% reduction)

Compliance Balance

Surplus or deficit in g CO₂ equivalent
Positive values (surplus) shown in green
Negative values (deficit) shown in red with alert icon
Cumulative balance for reporting year

Example Display:

Compliance Balance
-7.1M
g CO₂e

(Red alert indicator showing 7.1 million gram deficit) Potential Penalty

Calculated financial penalty if non-compliant at year-end
Based on current deficit and EU penalty rate (€2,400 per tonne CO₂e)
Red alert indicator for significant penalties
Updates dynamically as compliance balance changes

Example Display:

Potential Penalty
€418K
if non-compliant

Fuel Consumption Mix Interactive donut chart visualizing fuel type distribution:

HFO (Heavy Fuel Oil): Blue segment
MDO (Marine Diesel Oil): Green segment
Methanol: Orange segment
Other fuels: Additional segments as applicable

Hover functionality shows:

Fuel type name
Quantity consumed (MT)
Percentage of total fuel mix
Associated GHG emission factor

Compliance Status Checklist Quick reference indicators for multiple compliance dimensions:

Compliance Dimension	Status	Details
GHG Intensity Target	❌ Exceeded	Actual exceeds 2025 target by 2.5%
Shore Power Compliance	✅ 87% Connected	Meeting minimum connection requirements
Documentation	✅ Complete	All required records submitted
Verification Status	⚠️ Pending	Awaiting third-party verification

Visual Indicators:

✅ Green checkmark: Compliant
❌ Red X: Non-compliant
⚠️ Yellow warning: Pending or attention required

2. Vessel Data & Performance

Operational Performance Tracking: The Vessel Data module provides detailed operational performance data with voyage-level granularity for compliance analysis. Vessel Performance Data Table:

Date	Voyage	Distance (nm)	Fuel (MT)	GHG Intensity	Status
2025-01-15	EUROP-001	2847	245.8	91.2	NON-COMPLIANT
2025-01-10	EUROP-002	1923	165.4	89.7	COMPLIANT
2025-01-05	EUROP-003	3156	287.9	92.1	NON-COMPLIANT

Column Definitions:

Date: Voyage start date or reporting date
Voyage: Unique voyage identifier
Distance (nm): Nautical miles sailed on EU legs
Fuel (MT): Total fuel consumed in metric tonnes
GHG Intensity: Calculated well-to-wake GHG intensity (g CO₂e/MJ)
Status: Compliance status for that specific voyage
- COMPLIANT (green): GHG intensity below or equal to target
- NON-COMPLIANT (red): GHG intensity exceeds target

Search and Filter Capabilities:

Search across all data fields
Filter by date range
Filter by compliance status
Sort by any column
Export filtered data

Use Cases:

Identify voyages contributing to non-compliance
Analyze operational patterns affecting GHG intensity
Compare performance across different routes
Track improvement trends over time

3. Fuel & Energy Analysis

Detailed Fuel Consumption Breakdown: The Fuel & Energy module provides comprehensive analysis of fuel consumption patterns with associated emission factors. Fuel Consumption by Type Table:

Fuel Type	Consumption (MT)	Percentage (%)	GHG Factor
Marine Gas Oil	1247.5	45.2	3.206
Heavy Fuel Oil	892.3	32.3	3.114
Biofuel Blend	623.7	22.5	1.967

Column Definitions:

Fuel Type: Standardized fuel classification (HFO, MDO, MGO, LNG, Biofuels, etc.)
Consumption (MT): Total quantity consumed in metric tonnes for reporting period
Percentage (%): Share of total fuel consumption by mass
GHG Factor: Well-to-wake emission factor in g CO₂e per g fuel

Key Insights:

Fuel Mix Optimization: Identify opportunities to increase lower-emission fuel usage
Emission Contribution: Understand which fuels contribute most to GHG intensity
Alternative Fuel Adoption: Track uptake of biofuels, LNG, methanol, and other alternatives
Cost-Compliance Balance: Analyze trade-offs between fuel costs and emission reductions

Example Analysis: From the table above:

Marine Gas Oil contributes 45.2% of fuel consumption with a GHG factor of 3.206
Biofuel Blend at 22.5% has significantly lower GHG factor (1.967), reducing overall intensity
Strategy: Increasing biofuel blend percentage could help achieve compliance target

4. GHG Calculations & Voyage Summary

Voyage-Level Compliance Assessment: The GHG Calculations module provides detailed voyage-by-voyage compliance tracking with automatic EU leg classification. Vessel Selection:

Dropdown menu to select specific vessel
Shows vessel name, IMO number, and total voyages for reporting period
Example: “GARNET EXPRESS (IMO: 9609639) - 19 voyages”

Annual Compliance Summary:

Aggregated compliance status for selected vessel
Year-to-date GHG intensity vs. target
Cumulative compliance balance
Penalty projection if applicable

Voyage Summary Table:

Voyage ID	Route	Duration	EU Leg Type	GHG Intensity (Actual/Target)	Compliance Balance	Status
2507 B-L19	Anchorage → ULSAN	7 – 14 Oct	Non-EU	89.3 / 89.34	+2.80 × 10⁰⁴ (Surplus)	✅ Verified
2506 L-L18	Daesan/Seosan → Anchorage	19 Sep – 6 Oct	Non-EU	89 / 89.34	+5.41 × 10⁰⁶ (Surplus)	✅ Verified
2506 B-L17	Anchorage → Daesan/Seosan	24 Aug – 19 Sep	Non-EU	89 / 89.34	+3.84 × 10⁰⁶ (Surplus)	✅ Verified
2505 L-L16	ULSAN → Anchorage	6 – 24 Aug	Non-EU	89.1 / 89.34	+3.53 × 10⁰⁶ (Surplus)	✅ Verified
2505 B-L15	ULSAN → ULSAN	3 – 6 Aug	Non-EU	0 / 89.34	+0.00 × 10⁰⁰ (Surplus)	✅ Verified
2505 B-L14	Mackay → ULSAN	10 Jul – 2 Aug	Non-EU	89.1 / 89.34	+2.54 × 10⁰⁶ (Surplus)	✅ Verified
2504 L-L13	Gladstone → Mackay	8 – 10 Jul	Non-EU	89.1 / 89.34	+3.60 × 10⁰⁵ (Surplus)	✅ Verified

Column Definitions:

Voyage ID: Unique identifier for voyage (format: Year-Week-Leg-Number)
Route: Departure port → Arrival port
Duration: Start and end dates of voyage
Distance (NM): Nautical miles on EU legs (0 for non-EU voyages)
EU Leg Type: Classification determining compliance applicability
- EU → EU: 100% of voyage counted
- EU → Non-EU or Non-EU → EU: 50% of voyage counted
- Non-EU → Non-EU: 0% counted (shown as “Non-EU”)
GHG Intensity: Actual achieved vs. target (g CO₂e/MJ)
- Green indicator: Below target
- Red indicator: Above target
Compliance Balance: Surplus or deficit in g CO₂e
- Green indicator with ”+”: Surplus (better than target)
- Red indicator with ”-”: Deficit (worse than target)
- Scientific notation for large values
Status: Verification status
- ✅ Verified: Data validated and confirmed
- ⚠️ Pending: Awaiting verification
- ❌ Rejected: Data quality issues

Key Features:

Automatic EU Leg Detection: System identifies which voyages are subject to FuelEU regulation
Compliance Aggregation: Individual voyage balances sum to annual compliance position
Data Verification Workflow: Track verification status for regulatory reporting
Exportable Records: Generate voyage-level reports for audit and submission

5. Compliance Assessment

Non-Compliance Detection & Remediation: The Compliance Assessment module provides proactive monitoring and actionable recommendations for achieving regulatory compliance. Non-Compliance Alert:

Non-Compliance Detected
GHG intensity exceeds 2025 target by 2.5%. Immediate action required.

Alert Components:

Clear Status Indicator: Red banner with “Non-Compliance Detected” message
Quantified Deviation: Precise percentage by which target is exceeded
Urgency Level: “Immediate action required” for critical situations

Required Reduction:

Required Reduction
7.1M g CO₂e

Explanation:

Shows exact quantity of emission reductions needed to achieve compliance
Expressed in grams of CO₂ equivalent (g CO₂e)
Calculated as: (Actual GHG Intensity - Target) × Total Energy Consumed on EU Legs

Compliance Deadline:

Compliance Deadline
Dec 31, 2025

Regulatory Context:

FuelEU Maritime compliance assessed annually
Final compliance balance calculated on December 31 each year
Vessels must achieve annual target or face penalties
Countdown to deadline helps prioritize corrective actions

Compliance Status Checklist: Detailed breakdown of multiple compliance dimensions:

Compliance Dimension	Status	Details
GHG Intensity Target	❌ Exceeded	Actual 91.57 g CO₂e/MJ vs. Target 89.34 g CO₂e/MJ
Shore Power Compliance	✅ 87% Connected	Meeting minimum shore power connection requirements at EU ports
Documentation	✅ Complete	All required fuel consumption records, bunker delivery notes, and voyage logs submitted
Verification Status	⚠️ Pending	Awaiting third-party verifier approval of submitted data

Remediation Strategies: The platform automatically suggests compliance strategies:

Fuel Mix Optimization:
- Increase biofuel blend percentage
- Switch to lower-emission fuels (LNG, methanol, e-fuels)
- Recommended fuel mix changes to achieve target
Operational Efficiency:
- Slow steaming on EU legs to reduce fuel consumption
- Route optimization to minimize distance on EU waters
- Weather routing to improve fuel efficiency
Shore Power Utilization:
- Increase shore power connection time at EU ports
- Prioritize ports with shore power facilities
- Compliance credits for shore power usage
Flexibility Mechanisms:
- Purchase compliance credits from surplus vessels (pooling)
- Borrow from future years’ compliance balance
- Bank surplus for future years

6. Emission Factors Reference

Comprehensive Emission Factor Database: The Emission Factors module provides the complete regulatory reference database of GHG emission factors for all fuel types recognized under FuelEU Maritime. Emission Factors Table:

Fuel	Fuel Class	LCV (MJ/gFuel)	CO₂eq WtT (gCO₂eq/MJ)	Cf CO₂ (g/gFuel)	Cf CH₄ (g/gFuel)	Cf N₂O (g/gFuel)	Cslip (%)	Engine type
HFO	Fossil	0.0405	13.50	3.114	0.00005	0.000180	0	ALL ICEs
LFO	Fossil	0.0410	13.20	3.151	0.00005	0.000180	0	ALL ICEs
MDO/MGO	Fossil	0.0427	14.40	3.206	0.00005	0.000180	0	ALL ICEs
LNG	Fossil	0.0491	18.50	2.750	0	0.000110	3.1	LNG Otto (dual fuel medium speed)
LNG	Fossil	0.0491	18.50	2.750	0	0.000110	1.7	LNG Otto (dual fuel slow speed)
LNG	Fossil	0.0491	18.50	2.750	0	0.000110	0.2	LNG Diesel (dual fuel slow speed)
LNG	Fossil	0.0491	18.50	2.750	0	0.000110	2.6	LBSI
LPG (Butane)	Fossil	0.0460	7.80	3.030	0.00001	0.000010	0	ALL ICEs
LPG (Propane)	Fossil	0.0460	7.80	3.000	0.00001	0.000010	0	ALL ICEs
H2 (natural gas)	Fossil	0.1200	132.00	0.000	0	0	0	Fuel Cells
H2 (natural gas)	Fossil	0.1200	132.00	0.000	0	0	0	ICE
NH3 (natural gas)	Fossil	0.0186	121.00	0.000	0	0.000010	0	Fuel Cells
NH3 (natural gas)	Fossil	0.0186	121.00	0.000	0	0.000010	0	ICE
Methanol (natural gas)	Fossil	0.0199	31.30	1.375	0.00001	0.000010	0	ALL ICEs
Ethanol	Biofuels	-	-	1.913	0.00001	0.000010	0	ALL ICEs
Bio-diesel	Biofuels	-	-	2.834	0.00001	0.000010	0	ALL ICEs
HVO	Biofuels	-	-	3.115	0.00005	0.000180	0	ALL ICEs

Column Definitions:

Fuel: Fuel type name
Fuel Class:
- Fossil: Conventional petroleum-based fuels
- Biofuels: Renewable fuels from biological sources
- RFNBO: Renewable Fuels of Non-Biological Origin (e-fuels, green hydrogen, etc.)
LCV (MJ/gFuel): Lower Calorific Value - energy content per gram of fuel
CO₂eq WtT (gCO₂eq/MJ): Well-to-Tank emissions per megajoule of energy
Cf CO₂ (g/gFuel): Carbon content factor for CO₂ emissions per gram of fuel
Cf CH₄ (g/gFuel): Carbon content factor for methane emissions per gram of fuel
Cf N₂O (g/gFuel): Carbon content factor for nitrous oxide emissions per gram of fuel
Cslip (%): Carbon slip factor - percentage of fuel that escapes unburned (primarily for LNG engines)
Engine type: Applicable engine technology
- ALL ICEs: All Internal Combustion Engines
- LNG Otto: LNG dual-fuel engines (Otto cycle)
- LNG Diesel: LNG dual-fuel engines (Diesel cycle)
- LBSI: Low-pressure gas injection
- Fuel Cells: Hydrogen fuel cell systems
- ICE: Internal combustion engine (for alternative fuels)

Use Cases:

Accurate GHG Calculations: Ensure emission calculations use correct regulatory factors
Fuel Selection Analysis: Compare emission profiles of different fuel options
Alternative Fuel Evaluation: Assess GHG benefits of switching to biofuels or e-fuels
Regulatory Compliance: Verify calculations align with EU-mandated factors
What-If Scenarios: Model impact of fuel mix changes on GHG intensity

7. Shore Power Compliance

Shore Power Connection Monitoring: The Shore Power module tracks vessel compliance with EU requirements for shore power usage at berth. Regulatory Requirement: Under FuelEU Maritime, vessels must connect to shore power when available at EU ports for:

Container ships and passenger ships: Minimum 90% of port stay duration
Other vessel types: Compliance credits available for voluntary connection

Shore Power Compliance Status:

Shore Power Compliance
✅ 87% Connected

Metrics Tracked:

Connection Percentage: Percentage of eligible port time connected to shore power
Total Port Calls: Number of calls at EU ports with shore power facilities
Connected Port Calls: Number of times shore power was utilized
Connection Duration: Total hours connected vs. total hours at berth
Compliance Credits: GHG intensity credits earned through shore power usage

Benefits of Shore Power:

Direct Emission Reduction: Zero shipboard emissions while at berth
Compliance Credits: Reduces overall GHG intensity calculation
Penalty Avoidance: Meets mandatory connection requirements
Local Air Quality: Eliminates port emissions improving urban air quality

8. Reports & Export

Comprehensive Regulatory Reporting: The Reports module provides formatted exports for regulatory submission and internal analysis. Available Report Types: 1. Compliance Report

Annual compliance summary
Vessel-specific GHG intensity calculations
Compliance balance (surplus/deficit)
Penalty calculations if applicable
Verification status
Shore power compliance
Format: PDF for regulatory submission

2. Fuel Consumption Report

Detailed fuel consumption by type
Fuel mix analysis
Consumption trends over time
Bunker delivery note reconciliation
Format: Excel for detailed analysis

3. GHG Analysis Report

Voyage-level GHG intensity calculations
EU vs. non-EU leg breakdown
Emission factor applications
Tank-to-wake and well-to-tank emissions
Compliance trajectory forecasting
Format: PDF with charts and Excel data tables

Export Features:

One-Click Export: Generate reports with single button click
Automated Formatting: Reports formatted to EU regulatory requirements
Data Validation: Pre-export checks ensure data completeness
Audit Trail: Track report generation dates and versions
Bulk Export: Generate reports for multiple vessels simultaneously

AI-Powered Analytics & Insights

Machine Learning Capabilities

The FuelEU Compliance platform leverages advanced AI algorithms to transform operational data into strategic compliance intelligence. 1. Compliance Forecasting Engine Predictive Compliance Modeling: The platform uses historical fuel consumption patterns and planned voyages to forecast year-end compliance status. Input Variables:

Year-to-date fuel consumption by type
Planned voyages and routes for remainder of year
Historical fuel efficiency by route and season
Scheduled drydocking or operational changes
Fuel procurement plans and availability
Market prices for alternative fuels

Forecasting Model:

Balance_{projected} = Balance_{YTD} + \sum_{i=remaining} \left[ \left( GHG_{target} - GHG_{forecast,i} \ ight) \ imes E_{forecast,i} \ ight]

Where:

$Balance_{projected}$ = Projected year-end compliance balance
$Balance_{YTD}$ = Current year-to-date compliance balance
$GHG_{target}$ = Annual regulatory target
$GHG_{forecast,i}$ = Forecasted GHG intensity for remaining voyage $i$
$E_{forecast,i}$ = Forecasted energy consumption for remaining voyage $i$

Output:

Projected Year-End Status: Compliant or non-compliant
Confidence Interval: Statistical confidence in projection (e.g., 85% confidence)
Penalty Forecast: Projected penalty amount if non-compliant
Required Actions: Recommended interventions to achieve compliance
Timeline: Critical decision points for corrective actions

Example Forecast:

Projected Year-End Compliance Status: NON-COMPLIANT
Projected Deficit: -5.2M g CO₂e
Projected Penalty: €12,480
Confidence Level: 82%

Recommended Actions:
1. Increase biofuel blend to 35% for remaining voyages
2. Implement slow steaming on EU legs (reduce speed by 2 knots)
3. Prioritize shore power at Rotterdam and Hamburg calls
4. Consider purchasing 2M g CO₂e compliance credits

Timeline:
- Action required by: September 30, 2025
- Last opportunity for fuel mix change: November 15, 2025
- Compliance assessment deadline: December 31, 2025

2. Fuel Mix Optimization Algorithm Intelligent Fuel Strategy Recommendations: The AI analyzes fuel costs, emission factors, and availability to recommend optimal fuel mix for achieving compliance at minimum cost. Optimization Objective: Minimize total fuel cost while achieving GHG intensity target:

\ ext{Minimize: } \sum_{i} \left( m_{fuel,i} \ imes Cost_{fuel,i} \ ight)

Subject to constraints:

\frac{\sum_{i} \left( E_{TTW,i} + E_{WTT,i} \ ight)}{\sum_{i} E_{fuel,i}} \leq GHG_{target}

Where:

$m_{fuel,i}$ = Mass of fuel type $i$ to be consumed
$Cost_{fuel,i}$ = Price per tonne of fuel type $i$
$E_{TTW,i}$ = Tank-to-wake emissions from fuel type $i$
$E_{WTT,i}$ = Well-to-tank emissions from fuel type $i$
$E_{fuel,i}$ = Energy content of fuel type $i$
$GHG_{target}$ = Regulatory GHG intensity target

Additional Constraints:

Fuel availability at planned bunkering ports
Tank capacity and segregation requirements
Engine compatibility with fuel types
Minimum fuel quality specifications
Operational safety requirements

Optimization Output:

Recommended Fuel Mix for Q4 2025:

Current Mix:
- HFO: 45% (1,247 MT)
- MDO: 33% (892 MT)
- Biofuel Blend: 22% (624 MT)
Current GHG Intensity: 91.57 g CO₂e/MJ
Compliance Status: NON-COMPLIANT (-7.1M g CO₂e deficit)

Optimized Mix:
- HFO: 30% (850 MT)
- MDO: 35% (950 MT)
- Biofuel Blend (B30): 35% (1,000 MT)
Projected GHG Intensity: 88.92 g CO₂e/MJ
Compliance Status: COMPLIANT (+1.2M g CO₂e surplus)

Cost Impact:
- Current fuel cost: €1,850,000
- Optimized fuel cost: €2,120,000
- Additional cost: €270,000
- Avoided penalty: €418,000
- Net savings: €148,000

Recommendation: Implement optimized fuel mix
ROI: 55% savings vs. penalty payment
Payback: Immediate (avoid penalty)

3. Route Optimization for Compliance EU Water Avoidance Analysis: The platform analyzes alternative routes to minimize distance sailed in EU waters, reducing the energy consumption subject to FuelEU regulation. Routing Considerations:

EU Water Classification: Identify which portions of route are within EU jurisdiction
Alternative Routes: Evaluate longer routes that avoid or minimize EU waters
Fuel Consumption Impact: Calculate additional fuel for longer distance
Time Impact: Assess schedule implications of route changes
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Compare fuel costs vs. compliance benefit

Example Analysis:

Route Comparison: Rotterdam to Hamburg

Option 1: Direct Route (Current)
- Total Distance: 285 NM
- EU Waters: 285 NM (100%)
- Fuel Consumption: 24.5 MT
- GHG Intensity Impact: Full voyage counted
- Transit Time: 18 hours

Option 2: Extended North Sea Route
- Total Distance: 340 NM
- EU Waters: 220 NM (65%)
- Fuel Consumption: 29.2 MT
- GHG Intensity Impact: Reduced EU leg distance
- Transit Time: 21 hours
- Additional Cost: €3,500 (fuel)

Option 3: Via UK Waters (Post-Brexit)
- Total Distance: 310 NM
- EU Waters: 180 NM (58%)
- Fuel Consumption: 26.8 MT
- GHG Intensity Impact: Significantly reduced EU leg
- Transit Time: 19.5 hours
- Additional Cost: €1,800 (fuel)

Recommendation: Option 3 (Via UK Waters)
- Reduces EU leg by 42%
- Minimal schedule impact (+1.5 hours)
- Cost-effective compliance strategy
- Compliance benefit: -2.8M g CO₂e (reduces deficit)

4. Penalty vs. Compliance Cost Analysis Financial Optimization Decision Support: The platform compares the cost of achieving compliance through fuel changes, operational measures, or purchasing credits against the cost of paying non-compliance penalties. Decision Framework: Scenario A: Pay Penalty

Current compliance deficit: -7.1M g CO₂e
Penalty rate: €2,400 per tonne CO₂e
Total penalty: €17,040 (7.1M g ÷ 1,000,000 × €2,400)
Immediate cost: €17,040
Reputational risk: High (non-compliance record)
Future implications: Increased scrutiny, potential operational restrictions

Scenario B: Achieve Compliance via Biofuel

Required emission reduction: 7.1M g CO₂e
Biofuel premium: €200 per MT vs. conventional fuel
Additional biofuel needed: 450 MT
Total additional cost: €90,000
Compliance status: COMPLIANT
Reputational benefit: Positive environmental leadership
Future implications: Builds compliance track record

Scenario C: Purchase Compliance Credits

Required credits: 7.1M g CO₂e
Credit market price: €1,800 per tonne CO₂e (25% discount vs. penalty)
Total credit cost: €12,780
Compliance status: COMPLIANT (via flexibility mechanism)
Availability risk: Credit market liquidity uncertain
Future implications: Defers operational improvements

Scenario D: Hybrid Approach

Increase biofuel to 30% (reduce deficit by 4.5M g CO₂e)
Additional fuel cost: €55,000
Purchase remaining credits: 2.6M g CO₂e
Credit cost: €4,680
Total cost: €59,680
Compliance status: COMPLIANT
Best balance: Operational improvement + market flexibility

AI Recommendation:

Recommended Strategy: Scenario D (Hybrid Approach)

Financial Analysis:
- Total Cost: €59,680
- vs. Penalty: €17,040 (but with compliance achieved)
- vs. Full Biofuel: €90,000 (saves €30,320)
- vs. Full Credits: €12,780 (but with operational improvement)

Strategic Benefits:
✓ Achieves compliance for 2025
✓ Demonstrates commitment to emission reduction
✓ Builds operational capability for future targets
✓ Reduces reliance on credit market
✓ Minimizes reputational risk
✓ Cost-optimized solution

Implementation Plan:
1. Negotiate biofuel supply contract (B30 blend)
2. Schedule biofuel bunkering at Rotterdam and Antwerp
3. Monitor compliance balance through Q4
4. Purchase credits only if needed (hedging strategy)
5. Target: Achieve compliance by November 30

5. Alternative Fuel Scenario Modeling What-If Analysis for Fuel Transitions: The platform models the compliance and cost impact of transitioning to alternative fuels like LNG, methanol, ammonia, or hydrogen. Scenario Modeling Inputs:

Current fuel consumption profile
Alternative fuel emission factors
Fuel price differentials
Infrastructure availability (bunkering ports)
Engine compatibility and conversion costs
Operational range and bunkering frequency

Example Scenario: LNG Conversion

LNG Conversion Analysis - MV Europa Star

Current State (HFO/MDO):
- Annual Fuel Consumption: 3,500 MT
- GHG Intensity: 91.57 g CO₂e/MJ
- Annual Fuel Cost: €2,450,000
- Compliance Status: NON-COMPLIANT

Scenario: Convert to LNG Dual-Fuel:
- Annual LNG Consumption: 2,800 MT (energy equivalent)
- GHG Intensity: 82.15 g CO₂e/MJ (10.3% reduction)
- Annual Fuel Cost: €2,100,000 (€350,000 savings)
- Compliance Status: COMPLIANT (surplus +18.5M g CO₂e)

Investment Required:
- Engine retrofit: €3,500,000
- LNG tank installation: €1,200,000
- Safety systems: €300,000
- Total CAPEX: €5,000,000

Financial Analysis:
- Annual fuel savings: €350,000
- Annual penalty avoidance: €17,040
- Total annual benefit: €367,040
- Payback period: 13.6 years
- NPV (10% discount, 15 years): €1,245,000

Compliance Trajectory:
- 2025 Target (2% reduction): ✅ COMPLIANT
- 2030 Target (6% reduction): ✅ COMPLIANT
- 2035 Target (14.5% reduction): ✅ COMPLIANT
- 2040 Target (31% reduction): ⚠️ MARGINAL (may need biofuel blend)
- 2050 Target (80% reduction): ❌ REQUIRES ADDITIONAL MEASURES

Non-Financial Considerations:
✓ Future-proofs vessel for escalating targets through 2035
✓ Reduces local air pollutants (SOx, NOx, PM)
✓ Enhances vessel marketability and charter rates
✓ Aligns with corporate sustainability commitments
⚠️ LNG infrastructure availability limited at some ports
⚠️ Methane slip concerns (3.1% for medium-speed engines)
⚠️ Long-term uncertainty of LNG as "transition fuel"

Recommendation: Proceed with LNG conversion
- Strong compliance case through 2035
- Positive NPV over vessel lifetime
- Competitive advantage in charter market
- Consider bio-LNG blend for 2040+ compliance

6. Compliance Trend Analytics Historical Performance & Future Projections: The platform analyzes historical compliance trends to identify patterns and project future performance. Trend Analysis Components: Monthly GHG Intensity Trend:

Plot actual GHG intensity by month vs. annual target
Identify seasonal variations (e.g., winter weather, cargo types)
Detect operational changes impacting performance
Forecast remaining months based on historical patterns

Fuel Mix Evolution:

Track changes in fuel consumption mix over time
Correlate fuel mix changes with GHG intensity improvements
Identify successful fuel strategies for replication
Monitor alternative fuel adoption rates

Compliance Balance Trajectory:

Show cumulative compliance balance by month
Project year-end position based on current trend
Identify critical intervention points
Alert when trajectory indicates non-compliance risk

Voyage Performance Distribution:

Histogram of voyage-level GHG intensities
Identify outlier voyages requiring investigation
Analyze route-specific performance patterns
Benchmark against fleet average

Example Trend Insight:

Compliance Trend Analysis - MV Europa Star (2025)

Key Findings:

1. Seasonal Pattern Detected:
   - Q1 (Jan-Mar): Avg GHG Intensity 93.2 g CO₂e/MJ
   - Q2 (Apr-Jun): Avg GHG Intensity 90.8 g CO₂e/MJ
   - Q3 (Jul-Sep): Avg GHG Intensity 89.5 g CO₂e/MJ
   - Q4 Forecast: Avg GHG Intensity 91.2 g CO₂e/MJ
   
   Analysis: Q1 non-compliance driven by winter weather and heavy fuel loading
   Q2-Q3 improvement due to better weather and biofuel introduction

2. Fuel Mix Impact:
   - January: 0% biofuel, GHG 94.5 g CO₂e/MJ
   - March: 15% biofuel introduced, GHG dropped to 91.2 g CO₂e/MJ
   - June: 22% biofuel, GHG 89.8 g CO₂e/MJ
   - September: 25% biofuel, GHG 88.9 g CO₂e/MJ
   
   Correlation: Each 5% increase in biofuel blend reduces GHG by ~1.2 g CO₂e/MJ

3. Route-Specific Performance:
   - Rotterdam-Hamburg route: Consistently 2.5% above target
   - Antwerp-UK routes: Meet target 85% of time
   - Mediterranean routes: Exceed target by 4% (high speed operations)
   
   Recommendation: Implement slow steaming on Mediterranean routes

4. Year-End Projection:
   - Current trajectory: -7.1M g CO₂e deficit
   - If no action: -9.5M g CO₂e deficit by Dec 31
   - Required intervention: Increase biofuel to 32% for Q4
   - Projected result: -1.2M g CO₂e deficit (manageable via credits)

Action Plan:
✓ Increase biofuel procurement for Q4 (target 32% blend)
✓ Implement 1-knot speed reduction on Mediterranean routes
✓ Maximize shore power usage at Rotterdam and Hamburg
✓ Purchase 2M g CO₂e compliance credits as hedge
✓ Target: Achieve compliance by November 30

Illustrated Example: Compliance Management Workflow

Scenario: Managing Non-Compliance for MV Europa Star Consider a fleet manager responsible for ensuring FuelEU Maritime compliance for MV Europa Star (IMO 9234567) during the 2025 reporting year. Step 1: Identify Non-Compliance (January 2025) The fleet manager logs into the FuelEU Maritime Dashboard and immediately sees:

FuelEU Maritime Dashboard
MV Europa Star • IMO 9234567 • Reporting Year 2025

Status: NON-COMPLIANT

Actual GHG Intensity: 91.57 g CO₂e/MJ
2025 Target: 89.34 g CO₂e/MJ (2% reduction)
Compliance Balance: -7.1M g CO₂e
Potential Penalty: €418K if non-compliant

Alert Analysis:

Vessel is exceeding target by 2.5% (2.23 g CO₂e/MJ over limit)
Current deficit of 7.1 million grams CO₂e
If no action taken, penalty of €418,000 due on December 31, 2025
Compliance deadline: 11 months remaining

Step 2: Analyze Root Causes Navigate to Fuel & Energy tab to understand fuel consumption:

Fuel Type	Consumption (MT)	Percentage (%)	GHG Factor
Marine Gas Oil	1247.5	45.2	3.206
Heavy Fuel Oil	892.3	32.3	3.114
Biofuel Blend	623.7	22.5	1.967

Insights:

High reliance on conventional fuels (77.5% HFO/MDO)
Biofuel usage at 22.5% is helping but insufficient
HFO and MDO have high GHG factors (>3.1)
Opportunity: Increase biofuel percentage to reduce GHG intensity

Navigate to Vessel Data tab to identify problem voyages:

Date	Voyage	Distance (nm)	Fuel (MT)	GHG Intensity	Status
2025-01-15	EUROP-001	2847	245.8	91.2	NON-COMPLIANT
2025-01-10	EUROP-002	1923	165.4	89.7	COMPLIANT
2025-01-05	EUROP-003	3156	287.9	92.1	NON-COMPLIANT

Insights:

2 out of 3 voyages non-compliant
Longer voyages (EUROP-001, EUROP-003) have higher GHG intensity
Possible causes: High-speed operations, weather conditions, fuel mix

Step 3: Explore Compliance Strategies Use the AI-powered Fuel Mix Optimization tool:

Fuel Mix Optimization Scenarios:

Scenario A: Increase Biofuel to 30%
- Projected GHG Intensity: 90.15 g CO₂e/MJ
- Compliance Balance: -2.5M g CO₂e (still deficit)
- Additional Cost: €45,000
- Status: IMPROVED but still non-compliant

Scenario B: Increase Biofuel to 35%
- Projected GHG Intensity: 89.12 g CO₂e/MJ
- Compliance Balance: +0.8M g CO₂e (surplus)
- Additional Cost: €70,000
- Status: COMPLIANT

Scenario C: Increase Biofuel to 35% + Slow Steaming
- Projected GHG Intensity: 88.45 g CO₂e/MJ
- Compliance Balance: +2.5M g CO₂e (surplus)
- Additional Cost: €65,000 (biofuel) - €15,000 (fuel savings) = €50,000 net
- Status: COMPLIANT with buffer

Scenario D: Purchase Compliance Credits
- Required Credits: 7.1M g CO₂e
- Credit Cost: €12,780 (market price)
- Operational Changes: None
- Status: COMPLIANT (via flexibility mechanism)

Recommended Strategy: Scenario C (Biofuel + Slow Steaming)
- Achieves compliance with safety margin
- Lowest net cost (€50,000 vs. €418K penalty)
- Operational improvement for future years
- Reduces reputational risk

Step 4: Implement Corrective Actions Action Plan Generated:

Fuel Procurement (Immediate - February 2025):
- Contact biofuel suppliers for B35 blend availability
- Negotiate supply contract for 1,200 MT biofuel for 2025
- Schedule biofuel bunkering at Rotterdam, Antwerp, and Hamburg
- Target: 35% biofuel blend for all EU legs
Operational Measures (February - December 2025):
- Implement 1-knot speed reduction on EU legs (slow steaming)
- Update voyage planning to optimize weather routing
- Maximize shore power connection at EU ports
- Target: 90%+ shore power compliance
Monitoring & Verification (Ongoing):
- Weekly GHG intensity tracking
- Monthly compliance balance review
- Quarterly verification of fuel consumption records
- Target: Achieve compliance by November 30 (1-month buffer)
Contingency Planning (October 2025):
- If compliance balance still negative by October, purchase 2M g CO₂e credits
- Credit purchase budget: €3,600 (hedge against market volatility)
- Target: Ensure compliance by December 31 deadline

Step 5: Monitor Progress Monthly Compliance Review (June 2025):

FuelEU Maritime Dashboard
MV Europa Star • IMO 9234567 • Reporting Year 2025

Status: ON TRACK TO COMPLIANCE

Actual GHG Intensity (YTD): 89.82 g CO₂e/MJ
2025 Target: 89.34 g CO₂e/MJ (2% reduction)
Compliance Balance: -1.8M g CO₂e (improved from -7.1M)
Projected Year-End Balance: +0.5M g CO₂e (surplus)

Progress Update:
✓ Biofuel blend increased to 34% (target: 35%)
✓ Slow steaming implemented on 85% of EU legs
✓ Shore power compliance: 91% (exceeds 90% target)
✓ GHG intensity trending toward compliance

Remaining Actions:
- Continue biofuel blend at 35%
- Maintain slow steaming protocol
- Monitor Q3 performance (summer weather favorable)
- On track for compliance without credit purchase

Step 6: Year-End Compliance Achievement Final Compliance Report (December 2025):

FuelEU Maritime Dashboard
MV Europa Star • IMO 9234567 • Reporting Year 2025

Status: COMPLIANT ✅

Actual GHG Intensity (Annual): 88.97 g CO₂e/MJ
2025 Target: 89.34 g CO₂e/MJ (2% reduction)
Compliance Balance: +1.2M g CO₂e (SURPLUS)
Penalty: €0 (compliant)

Annual Summary:
✓ Achieved compliance through fuel mix optimization
✓ Biofuel blend averaged 35.2% for year
✓ Slow steaming reduced fuel consumption by 8%
✓ Shore power compliance: 92% (exceeded target)
✓ Surplus banked for future years (flexibility mechanism)

Financial Outcome:
- Total Additional Cost: €52,000 (biofuel premium)
- Penalty Avoided: €418,000
- Net Savings: €366,000
- ROI: 705% return on compliance investment

Strategic Benefits:
✓ Compliance achieved without purchasing credits
✓ Operational improvements in place for 2026
✓ Positive environmental track record
✓ Vessel positioned for escalating future targets
✓ Enhanced charter market competitiveness

Benefits & Outcomes

Operational Excellence

Proactive Compliance Management: Real-time monitoring prevents year-end non-compliance surprises
Data-Driven Decision Making: AI-powered analytics optimize fuel mix and operational strategies
Cost Optimization: Minimize compliance costs through intelligent fuel procurement and route planning
Penalty Avoidance: Eliminate risk of substantial FuelEU Maritime penalties (up to €2,400/tonne CO₂e)
Operational Efficiency: Identify fuel-efficient practices that reduce both emissions and costs

Strategic Advantages

Future-Proofing: Position vessels for escalating GHG targets through 2050
Competitive Differentiation: Demonstrate environmental leadership to charterers and stakeholders
Regulatory Readiness: Automated reporting ensures timely and accurate EU submissions
Fleet Optimization: Coordinate compliance strategies across multiple vessels for maximum efficiency
Investment Planning: Model alternative fuel transitions with accurate ROI projections

Financial Impact

Penalty Avoidance: Eliminate non-compliance penalties (€418K in example scenario)
Fuel Cost Optimization: Balance fuel costs against compliance requirements
Credit Market Strategy: Optimize use of flexibility mechanisms (pooling, banking, borrowing)
Investment ROI: Evaluate alternative fuel conversions with comprehensive financial modeling
Budget Predictability: Forecast compliance costs for accurate financial planning

Environmental & Reputational

Emission Reductions: Achieve measurable GHG intensity reductions through fuel and operational optimization
Environmental Leadership: Demonstrate commitment to decarbonization and sustainability
Stakeholder Confidence: Provide transparent compliance reporting to investors and customers
Regulatory Relationships: Build positive relationships with EU authorities through consistent compliance
Corporate Sustainability: Contribute to company-wide emission reduction targets

Summary

The SIYA FuelEU Maritime Compliance platform transforms complex EU greenhouse gas regulations into actionable operational intelligence. By integrating vessel noon reports, ERP data, and external voyage information, the platform provides:

Real-Time Compliance Monitoring: Continuous tracking of GHG intensity against annual regulatory targets
Accurate GHG Calculations: Precise well-to-wake emission calculations using EU-mandated factors
Voyage-Level Analysis: Individual voyage assessment with automatic EU leg classification
Financial Impact Assessment: Penalty calculations and cost-benefit analysis for compliance strategies
Fuel Mix Optimization: AI-powered recommendations for optimal fuel blending to achieve compliance
Compliance Forecasting: Predictive modeling of year-end compliance status with intervention recommendations
Alternative Fuel Scenarios: What-if analysis for LNG, methanol, ammonia, and other fuel transitions
Regulatory Reporting: Automated generation of compliance reports for EU authority submission
Fleet-Wide Coordination: Multi-vessel compliance management with pooling and credit optimization
Trend Analytics: Historical performance analysis and future compliance trajectory projections

The platform empowers fleet managers, technical superintendents, and environmental officers to proactively manage FuelEU Maritime compliance, optimize fuel strategies, avoid substantial penalties, and position vessels for long-term success in an increasingly regulated maritime environment. Regulatory Compliance Made Simple:

Navigate complex FuelEU Maritime regulations with confidence
Transform regulatory burden into competitive advantage
Achieve compliance at minimum cost through intelligent optimization
Future-proof your fleet for escalating emission reduction targets through 2050

Micro Apps

​FuelEU Maritime Regulation Compliance – Methodology Guide